|
|
|
|
|
|
© DR -SUNSHINE de Danny Boyle (2007) p19
11/03/2013 17:56
La critique 3 (suite)
A la tête du film, une équipe des plus soudée avec le réalisateur Boyle et son scénariste fétiche Alex Garland avec lequel il a notamment travaillé sur 28 jours plus tard et La plage. Bien loin de réaliser un film de science-fiction se bornant en un étalement d’effets spéciaux, Boyle décide de s’éloigner du cinéma d’esbroufe pour se plonger davantage dans la psychologie des personnages.
Cloitré dans un vaisseau avec à proximité l’astre divin et hanté par l’agréable sensation de pouvoir être le sauveur du monde, chaque personnage en vient à dévier psychologiquement. Dès lors, tentant de contrer les différents problèmes rencontrés, chacun tente de mener à bien sa mission tout en n’oubliant pas de … dénoncer l’incapacité des autres.Une intrigue naît alors:on s’accuse, on se détruit,on enferme un compagnon à la psychologie trop friable, on en envoie d'autres en sacrifice… En ce sens, le film a bien plus à offrir que ce qu’il laissait prévoir lors de la lecture de son synopsis.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© DR -SUNSHINE de Danny Boyle (2007) p20
11/03/2013 18:04
La critique 3 (fin)
Mais, forcément, à côté de cette aventure humaine, subsiste une aventure scientifique que les auteurs ont voulu vraisemblable. La production a sollicité la NASA dans son travail de documentation. L’équipe a visionné plusieurs documentaires sur les voyages spatiaux ainsi que quelques grands classiques du cinéma du genre.De surcroit, Brian Cox du CERN (Centre Européen de Recherche Nucléaire) a été engagé en tant que personne-ressource sur la plateau et a pu éclairer l’équipe technique et les acteurs et leur fournir des explications importantes sur le fonctionnement du système solaire.
Ainsi, comme dans tout bon film de science-fiction, une certaine cohérence scientifique est respectée et les éléments introduits ne dénotent pas la plus grande exagération.Pour réaliser les décors, des tonnes de bois ont été utilisés. Un nombre incalculable de menuisiers, d’électriciens et d’artisans se sont mis au travail pour livrer le résultat final. Un travail mené de main de maître par Mark Tildesley qui a également collaboré à 28 jours plus tard et sa séquelle 28 semaines plus tard. La lumière solaire, quant à elle, a été figurée par des lumières oranges et du matériel réfléchissant, le tout retouché grâce au numérique.En somme, un boulot colossal qui porte ses fruits tant le film est réussi. *
Ne s’arrêtant pas aux simples fx pour surprendre des spectateurs acquis à sa cause, Boyle va plus loin dans sa recherche et parviendra même à épater tout le monde en faisant dévier son film vers la fin pour changer complètement de genre et de style.Une déviation qui, comme celle de la navette et des personnages, va s’avérer subtile et va changer complètement la physionomie de l’œuvre…. Par : Damien Taymans-CINEMA FANTASTIQUE
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© DR -SUNSHINE de Danny Boyle (2007) p21
11/03/2013 18:10
A terrific study in sanity
Author: Mr_PCM from Sheffield, England 5 April 2007
How would we cope under the most extreme circumstances imaginable? That is the question posed by Danny Boyle's latest offering, and the answer seems to be that anybody can be pushed over the edge, it is just a question of what and how much it takes.
Danny Boyle seems unable to settle on a genre specialty, but it also seems that whatever he turns his hand to he can make work (with the exception of romantic comedy - A Life Less Ordinary anyone?). In his latest, the sun is dying, and we join the 2nd attempt to try and restart the star by delivering a nuclear bomb to kick-start it. Having been alone in space for the past 16 months, the eight-man crew is approaching its destination, but nerves are starting to fray. Then they pick up a signal rom the ship that made the first, unsuccessful, attempt. Inevitably they go and investigate, and problems ensue.
When the inevitable disaster occurs, jeopardising the mission, we begin to see how people deal with extreme circumstances, and how their sanity is affected, in different ways. Elements are recognisable from Alien, Solaris and Event Horizon, and the film certainly benefits from all of those influences. The claustrophobia, the understated technology, the dark corridors, the unseen menace, all recognisable but effectively used.
This is not a typical science fiction per se. There are no aliens, no space battles, and no ultra-advanced technology on show. Instead Boyle chooses a more philosophical tangent, leading to questions of exactly what defines humanity, and the value of a single life weighed against the future of mankind.The casting is excellent, with many recognisable but no particularly famous faces, the biggest names being Batman Begins' Cillian Murphy and Fantastic Four's Chris Evans.
This lack of star names, combined with a cast of only the eight crew somehow makes the loneliness and the feeling of being a huge distance from home with a long way to go seem even more real. We really begin to feel with the crew as they try to hold it together long enough to complete their vital mission. Cillian Murphy in particular is a piece of inspired casting, as in many of his roles he has always appeared on the very brink of insanity anyway, so he has the close-to-crazy act down to a tee.
The CGI of the sun is extremely impressive, particularly considering the relatively low budget of the film, and the simple but intense story has viewers on the edge of the seat virtually from first act to last. The suspense is built gradually but extremely effectively, to the extent where you can feel your sanity heading the way of the astronauts' as the conclusion approaches with increasing speed.Overall a very effective study in what a tenuous thing sanity is when faced with huge odds and a great threat. Thrilling, gripping and thought-provoking, and another genre nailed by Boyle - now if only he could crack that pesky rom-com!
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© DR -SUNSHINE de Danny Boyle (2007) p22
11/03/2013 18:20
Sunshine - rather good..
Author: Grandma Death from United Kingdom 16 April 2007
Sunshine cost £20 million. Jerry Bruckheimer and his Hollywood cohorts must be shaking their heads in disbelief. Danny Boyle and Alex Garland, British born and bred, have outdone America's effects laden finest, and at a mere fraction of the price. Armageddon ($140 million) and Pirates of The Caribbean 2 ($225 million) have nothing, nothing on the majestic visuals that Sunshine offers. From the jaw dropping opening sequence to the fantastically realised final moments, Boyle's latest is a mighty treat for the eyes.
But of course, effects do not make a film. You need only consider the two aforementioned Bruckheimer blowouts for proof. But happily, behind the blinding visuals, Sunshine has a violently beating heart. One that offers absolutely no let up, that gains speed and then gains a little more, before finally threatening cardiac arrest. You can't help but live and breath every moment of the crew's breathless existence.
The year is 2057 and a select group of astronauts are given that most trifling of tasks. The sun is dying. Drop a bomb in it. Save all of mankind. And to top it all, on a ship rather ominously named 'Icarus II'. Add inevitable inter crewmember tension and you have a rather heated situation. The sweaty crew are played wonderfully by a decidedly un-starry, but talented cast. Cilian Murphy, taking the lead role as the ship's resident physicist Cappa, the only member who has the wherewithal to actually drop the bomb, is coolly enigmatic as ever, the blue orbs of his eyes forming a nice counterpoint to the never far rather redder orb of the sun. You can't help but feel he isn't particularly challenged as an actor, but nevertheless he provides a suitably ambivalent, androgynous and faintly unsettling core to the proceedings.
Perhaps more impressive is Chris Evans. Recently seen in a similarly hot headed role in the undercooked comic book adaptation 'Fantastic Four', he consistently snatches scenes from Murphy as engineer Mace, about as volatile and fiery as Cappa is composed and cool. Without Evan's energetic performance, the film would sink into an anti-libidinal quag. Mace's emotive instability injects pace when it's needed and brings some welcome variety to the otherwise glum faces. Evans is surely on the brink of big things. A small quibble would be that there are perhaps a few too many characters; meaning that a fair share of the cast never really gets a chance for development, which is irritating, as one gets the feeling that there's a lot of wasted potential. Another chink in Sunshine's spacesuit, is in many places, Alex Garland's screenplay. Whilst he has a remarkable talent for creating intense psychological tension, of which there is plenty in Sunshine, his philosophising is much less satisfactory. This is not to say he doesn't play with some fascinating ideas. With the crew circling so close to the Sun, to the giver of life, Garland begins ask the biggest of questions.
Is there something, something inestimably greater than ourselves, something that could create such a magnificent star, or are we, like the sun, simply dust? It's a great idea, but for the larger part of the film, it seems oddly shoehorned into what is at base a sci-fi pot-boiler. In fact these ideas are better expressed in Boyle's imagery. Time and time again we see members of the crew staring aghast at the immensity of the burning ball of gas and dust in front of them. The relationship between giver and taker is better explored here than in any line of Garland's.
The structure of his screenplay is also a little unwieldy. The first hour and a half play as an intense psychological study - the pace at times painfully weighty as the tension is ratcheted up ever higher. The film works beautifully here - it may not introduce anything particularly new; claustrophobic stress is certainly nothing new in sci-fi, but it follows genre conventions with such panache and artistry that it's difficult to fault. However, come the final 20 minutes, Sunshine takes a rather abrupt and unwelcome turn. A pretty hammy (not to mention poorly explained) plot twist is ushered in and suddenly we find ourselves in a horror film - a clichéd one at that.
To say much more would spoil things, but needless to say, had the filmmakers showed a little restraint in the closing moments, they would have had a real classic on their hands. When the film ditches pretensions, and sticks with the clammy, slow burn thrills it excels at, it's fantastic. When it descends into predictable melodrama, it's still alright, it's just disappointing considering what we know it's capable of. As such it's remarkably well shot, superbly rendered, occasionally poignant and occasionally flawed. Whatever the case, Sunshine is never far from entirely thrilling, and, all said and done, film recommendations don't come much higher than that.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
© DR -SUNSHINE de Danny Boyle (2007) p23
11/03/2013 18:27
A crew of eight tries to save mankind from freezing to death
Author: D B from Austria 4 March 2007
I was very lucky being able to get into a preview of this movie today in Vienna. I only knew very little about it in advance, so my expectations were quite neutral.One word of advice: this movie is not for nitpickers or physicist. The plot outline (i.e. detonating a "stellar bomb" inside the sun) sounds ludicrous at first - but if you're able to ignore this and some other scientific nonsense, you get one great movie.
This one is all about the details and the crew's behavior. Danny Boyle once again proves his insight into the human psyche as he portraits how the crew-members handle the various arising problems, some of the decision-making is displayed frighteningly realistic compared to other movies in the genre. Cillian Murphy (brilliant as ever) and Chris Evans (hated him in Fantastic 4, but showed a great performance here) pair up very nicely during most many scenes.
The entire movie has a certain feel to it, the atmosphere is very tense and Boyle manages to keep the pace at quite a high level the entire time. Visual FX are at a high level as well.Apparently Sunshine can't deny the influences from 2001 or Event Horizon, nevertheless it should be treated as an independent film.A few deductions for some glitches and the scientific stuff, otherwise great entertainment!
| |
|
|
|
|