| Accueil | Créer un blog | Accès membres | Tous les blogs | Meetic 3 jours gratuit | Meetic Affinity 3 jours gratuit | Rainbow's Lips | Badoo |
newsletter de vip-blog.com S'inscrireSe désinscrire
http://tellurikwaves.vip-blog.com


 CINEMA :Les blessures narcissiques d'une vie par procuration
VIP Board
Blog express
Messages audio
Video Blog
Flux RSS

CINEMA :Les blessures narcissiques d'une vie par procuration

VIP-Blog de tellurikwaves
  • 12842 articles publiés
  • 103 commentaires postés
  • 1 visiteur aujourd'hui
  • Créé le : 10/09/2011 19:04
    Modifié : 09/08/2023 17:55

    Garçon (73 ans)
    Origine : 75 Paris
    Contact
    Favori
    Faire connaître ce blog
    Newsletter de ce blog

     Octobre  2025 
    Lun Mar Mer Jeu Ven Sam Dim
    29300102030405
    06070809101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    272829300102

    ©-DR- YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU de Frank Capra (1938) p21

    21/04/2017 04:21

    ©-DR- YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU de Frank Capra (1938) p21







    ©-DR- YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU de Frank Capra (1938) p22

    21/04/2017 04:23

    ©-DR- YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU de Frank Capra (1938) p22


    La critique de Witney Seibold (fin)

    When the families meet, it’s embarrassing. Will the ultra-stuffy rich people ever understand the wild freedoms of the tax-free weirdos? Will the weirdos lose their patience with the ambition of the rich? These interactions play out naturally, comedically, and beautifully sentimentally. The rest of the film is essentially a struggle to reconcile freedom and The Man. Indeed, when one brushes back a few layers, one can easily find a salient comment on notions of American liberty. What is it to be free? Is it the freedom to pursue whatever you want? Perhaps, but how does one do whatever they want when the law may stand in the way? And what of the wealthy, whose freedom seems to surpass yours?

    Perhaps this is why You Can’t Take It With You is always a good film to watch in any era: Its setting may be 1938, but its conceits are somehow timeless.You Can’t Take It With You only won two Oscars that year: Best Picture and Best Supporting Actress (Spring Byington played Martin’s ever-strong wife, Penny). It’s also one of the best Best Pictures I have seen so far. It may feel a bit dated, but it’s also still 100% moving and wonderful. It comes from an era when people could make speeches about their ideals, and seem stronger for it. Please see this one. Heck, see any Frank Capra movie. Between this film and 1939’s Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Capra was on a roll.

     le 2Mai 2014






    ©-DR- YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU de Frank Capra (1938) p23

    21/04/2017 04:27

    ©-DR- YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU de Frank Capra (1938) p23







    ©-DR- YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU de Frank Capra (1938) p24

    21/04/2017 15:20

    ©-DR- YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU de Frank Capra (1938) p24


    Edward Arnold : Anthony P. Kirby & 
    Lionel Barrymore  : Grand-père Martin Vanderhof
     
     
     
     
    *
     
     
    La critique d'Oskar Champs
    You Can’t Take It With You – 1938
     
    You Can’t Take It With You clobbered me.  It beat me over the head with a message… but I didn’t mind.  The message of this Outstanding Picture winning movie was:  There are things in life that are more important than money.  It is a very true statement, to be sure, and at times the message was so blatant and unrepentant that it bordered on being preachy.  But that being said, I really did enjoy the movie.
     
    We’ll start off with the cast of actors.  Jean Arthur as Alice Sycamore, our kooky female romantic lead, Lionel  Barrymore as Grandpa Martin Vanderhof, Alice’s eccentric grandfather , Edward Arnold as Anthony Kirby, the stuffy business man, and a very young James Stewart as Tony Kirby, our other romantic lead.  Barrymore did a particularly good job as the head of the Vanderhof/Sycamore/Carmichael clan.  His character was very gentle, loveable, understanding, self-sacrificing, and charming, and yet human enough to lose his temper and really blow up at someone when driven to it.  Barrymore brought all this out quite believably.  Kudos to him.
     
    Interesting note:  Barrymore’s arthritic foot was written into the script as a sprained ankle, allowing the actor to be on crutches for the entire film.
     





    ©-DR- YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU de Frank Capra (1938) p25

    21/04/2017 15:22

    ©-DR- YOU CAN'T TAKE IT WITH YOU de Frank Capra (1938) p25


    La critique d'Oskar Champs (fin)

    And then, of course, James Stewart is always great to watch.  He has a very easy on-screen presence.  He seems to be completely comfortable in front of the cameras whether the situation is romantic, comedic, or dramatic.  One curious thing about his character, though:  James Stewart has a very slight southern drawl.  You hear it in nearly every role he  plays.  It doesn’t matter that none of the other actors who play his family in the movie have this accent.  But hey, it’s Jimmy Stewart, so I didn’t mind.

    The movie is a feel-good movie.  By the end of the film, you end up liking all the characters.  You feel happy for all of them.  The bad guys become good, the young couple in love can get married, and everyone becomes friends.  And by the way… Did I mention that there are things in life that are more important than money?The plot is a simple one.  The son of a rich, stuffy, and ruthless business man falls in love with a girl from a poor, eccentric, and loveable family. 

    Of course, the rich man wants to buy the poor man’s house, but the poor man cares nothing for money and will not sell.  But when the love-birds bring the two families together, there is an awkward culture clash that has pretty funny results.  As a matter of fact, I would even call this movie a zany comedy at times.  But there were also profound dramatic moments that made you feel for characters from both families.

    Something else that caught my attention is the fact that most romantic comedies are somewhat predictable.  But this movie made me pause.  At the climax of the film, I couldn’t easily tell which way the story would go, and that gave more weight to the drama.  And did I mention that there are things in life that are more important than money?

    Two supporting actors in the film who stood out to me were Spring Byington who played Alice’s mother, Penny Sycamore, and Dub Taylor who played Alice’s brother-in-law Ed Carmichael.  Byington played a mother who loved being artistic in any way that took her fancy, but a few of her off-the-wall lines almost made her seem like a loveable air-head. 

    Taylor’s character was an amusing country bumpkin.  He is not particularly smart at times, but he is a good-hearted guy who obviously loves his wife, played by a fifteen year old Ann Miller. He also plays a mean xylophone!   They were both fun to watch.

    This movie had a lot to offer.  It had comedy, drama, romance, big name actors, a good message, and a story that left me smiling when it was all over.  It was definitely worthy of the Outstanding Picture Award.

    Interesting note:  In 1938 the country was still coming out of the Great Depression.  The message of the movie was probably very appealing to a lot of audiences.  There are indeed things in life that are more important than money.






    Début | Page précédente | 2430 2431 2432 2433 2434 2435 2436 2437 2438 2439 2440 2441 2442 2443 2444 2445 2446 2447 2448 | Page suivante | Fin
    [ Annuaire | VIP-Site | Charte | Admin | Contact tellurikwaves ]

    © VIP Blog - Signaler un abus