| Accueil | Créer un blog | Accès membres | Tous les blogs | Meetic 3 jours gratuit | Meetic Affinity 3 jours gratuit | Rainbow's Lips | Badoo |
newsletter de vip-blog.com S'inscrireSe désinscrire
http://tellurikwaves.vip-blog.com


 CINEMA :Les blessures narcissiques d'une vie par procuration
VIP Board
Blog express
Messages audio
Video Blog
Flux RSS

CINEMA :Les blessures narcissiques d'une vie par procuration

VIP-Blog de tellurikwaves
  • 12842 articles publiés
  • 103 commentaires postés
  • 1 visiteur aujourd'hui
  • Créé le : 10/09/2011 19:04
    Modifié : 09/08/2023 17:55

    Garçon (73 ans)
    Origine : 75 Paris
    Contact
    Favori
    Faire connaître ce blog
    Newsletter de ce blog

     Novembre  2025 
    Lun Mar Mer Jeu Ven Sam Dim
    272829300102
    03040506070809
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930

    ©-DR- Marlène Dietrich : Addendum p15

    13/10/2014 13:51

    ©-DR- Marlène Dietrich : Addendum  p15


    1950 : Le Grand Alibi (Stage Fright)






    ©-DR- Marlène Dietrich : Addendum p16

    13/10/2014 13:53

    ©-DR- Marlène Dietrich : Addendum  p16


    1950 : Le Grand Alibi (Stage Fright) d'Alfred Hitchcock






    ©-DR- Marlène Dietrich : Addendum -FIN-

    13/10/2014 13:55

    ©-DR- Marlène Dietrich : Addendum  -FIN-







    ©-DR-Films Mewdiks -1

    14/10/2014 03:03

    ©-DR-Films Mewdiks -1


    Perdu un temps précieux à regarder cette daube diffusée sur CANAL SAT

    *

    *

    If you are a psychopath, you will love this, otherwise watch something else.

    1/10
    Author: headhunter83 from Sweden
    17 October 2012

     

    *** This review may contain spoilers ***

    Maybe it's just me, but if you want to make a violent dark movie, you set the mood accordingly. What this movie tries to do is to lure you in, thinking it's a funny (dark sure) but just a little twisted comedy, but then surprise you into something completely different. It wants to shock you and disgust you and it hopes you will be impressed by the surprising turns, the fact that it's not like any other movie. I am really interested in seeing how this movies rating will end up. Right now it has 7,5/10 with 4,177 votes. My guess is this movie will be around a 6/10 at best unless there are a lot of sick people out there who enjoy being shocked and disgusted and left feeling confused.

    It's a movie without a point, other then chaos and randomness. No character does what you think they will do, no character really inspires you. The story made me feel disgusted and it left me with a little less hope in mankind :)

    The acting was decent. Matthew McConaughey does his part well. Emile Hirsch's character is so annoying it's hard to appreciate the acting behind it. Juno Temple was very good.

    But all in all, why watch this movie? Why would you like it? I guess some people like to be surprised and watch something new. I think it's just stupid because the majority who watches movies are looking for a meaningful story.

    I like violent movies. At some point I felt this movie tries to be like a Quentin Tarantino movie, but still it's far from it. These characters are random. The atmosphere is easygoing and at times funny, but compared to a Tarantino flick the dialog is that of stupid, uninteresting people. You could argue that the point is to show how scared and not too bright people could react in a pressed situation. But is that really interesting enough to make into a film? Who would enjoy that? If you want to see senseless violence, watch a horror/action movie and get your bloodlust satisfied. Watch a movie that does not try to be everything all at once but that fails to deliver anything worthwhile. Unless you are a psychopath, then you will love this movie.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    9 out of 15 people found the following review useful:

    So So

    1/10
    Author: Franky Lamouche from United States
    22 January 2013

    *** This review may contain spoilers ***

    William Friedkin makes good use of sound at the beginning of "Killer Joe." The introductory heraldic company titles are rendered over silence, forgoing fanfare, making the first montage of concrete audio all the more striking. Completed with a white on black, bold but neutral, Killer Joe title over twanging guitar. The movie confirms Friedkin's mastery of inside space, the single wide in "Killer Joe"'s case. These trailers are given a bad rap due to their association with lowlifes, trash talkers and makers. The truth is most 55+ communities outside of large cities are made up of these boxes and one is prosecuted if one doesn't pick up after one's dog.

    A door decorated as "DOTTIE DREAM." A portal to a child's room, a grown up little girl, a virgin in hillbilly Sodom & Gomorrah. See the role's originator Carroll Baker as "Baby Doll" (http://www.imdb.com/media/rm3065156096/tt0048973).

    It gets real hillbilly real fast and we just go along for the ride, never expecting a family comedy which, unfortunately, turns very sour very fast. Over money of course. I saw nothing Gothic. To begin with, hillbilly ain't the south, it's pretty much the country with West Virginia its epicenter. As a modern movie, "Killer Joe" portrays the normal dysfunctional family. When Matthew joins the circle, pedophilia lights a fuse to disaster.

    A beautiful set up for the dark knight, Matt McConaughey, Killer Joe. Unfortunately, the classical "Scorpio Rising" approach to our first sighting of the demon is undercut by the absence of music to make it memorable. From then on the movie loses its comic crazy character and becomes cold and detached. The pit bull barks at everyone but Killer Joe.

    The end of the final scene followed by the song under the credit role are beyond stupid, beyond evil, in a realm indeterminate, meaningless.

    In summary, a so so movie with no social redeeming value. As you can tell, I'm a William Friedkin fan, so I stuck with it. A failure compared to his masterful "To Live and Die in LA." Matthew McConaughey gives William Petersen a run for his money, but Emile Hirsh can't hold a candle to Willem Dafoe. Wasn't he great as Max Schreck in "Shadow of the Vampire."

    A humble viewer, Franky Lamouche.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    13 out of 23 people found the following review useful:

    Am I the only one that doesn't get it?

    1/10
    Author: Rachel Lee from United States
    26 February 2013

    *** This review may contain spoilers ***

    This is one of the WORST movie I've ever seen. I don't get the story. This is a seriously twisted family. Son frequently hits his own mother. Mother tried to smother her own baby girl. Son wants to kill his own mother. Stepmom walks around naked in front of the grown stepson. Father and brother have NO problem whatsoever to pimp out their little girl. Father and sister kill their own son/brother. Wife cheats on husband, which seems so trivial for this family. Husband watches wife being beaten up and offers no help.

    What's the point of this movie? What's the merit of watching such an unbelievably twisted family? What is the enjoyment I will get as an audience? Am I supposed to feel better about myself because my family is normal? Am I supposed to feel sympathetic to the characters that I can NOT relate to at all? How am I entertained?

    I am very surprised to see such a high rating on this movie. Maybe there is something I am missing. I don't get it at all.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    32 out of 61 people found the following review useful:

    Dark and violent - Not funny or entertaining

    1/10
    Author: ziggylamont from United Kingdom
    8 July 2012

    This is the niche market of a misunderstood disturbing script wanting a reaction. I liked The French Connection, I didn't like the Exorcist, and I hate Killer Joe. This piece of cinema is best left to the DVD market. If I were closer to the aisle and not with a friend I would have walked out. The friend that I went with echoed this as soon as the drivel was finally exhausted. Staying until the end did not even complete the story. Friedkin obviously has too much time and money on his hands; unlike the average movie-goer. Don't watch this "movie". The dialogue did not once get a laugh. The only time the audience reacted was from a deliberate costume failure. Be scared of anyone who likes this movie.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    9 out of 16 people found the following review useful:

    Sucked

    1/10
    Author: coconutphil from United States
    9 January 2013

    This movie was simply a trailer park trash tale of greed. Really an all time low for Matthew. I really cannot believe the trash that is being out out these days. The scene where the the dudes face is being pounded with a can of pumpkin pie filling was the only decent part. The porn scene with the chicken leg was simply trash. The story really goes no where. A few folks really never have their roles in the story developed. This movie could have been good if the porn was left out and the story was better. Seemed like they were trying to do a Terentino thing, it was just awful. Stay far away from this garbage. Maybe next time.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    14 out of 26 people found the following review useful:

    glorification of the low class. Boring and trite. Pure trash

    1/10
    Author: tom jones from United States
    2 January 2013

    If anyone has any doubt as to who is actually posting the positive reviews, just carefully read the positive reviews and their stark similarities. Particularly the word, "noir" and a few others. I've been fairly sure for some time that movie companies pad the rating on any fan site and this one is certainly no exception. Therefore do not take the rating here on IMDb, OR the positive reviews that could all have been written by the same person they are so similar. This movie has very little humor contrary to others claims. It is not suspenseful in any way. The plot is simplistic and trite. While the acting within the film is certainly up to par it's really all that can be said about this movie. The supposedly shocking scenes don't really shock you probably because 10 minutes into the film you really couldn't care less about virtually everyone in it. Every step of the way you can see the film makers patting themselves on the back with their clever little, "shocking" surprises. They are the only ones impressed which is why they come here to IMDb and give themselves rave reviews. Instead of watching this movie just go down to the local welfare office and watch these people. At least that way it will not cost you any money. Stay away from this film. It's boring and pointless. It's not even shocking for those of you who just like to be shocked.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    2 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

    The Worst

    1/10
    Author: kiwioneill from Australia
    31 January 2014

    When the credits rolled down at the end I couldn't believe I would never get those two hours of my life back.

    People that like this movie are clearly trying too be those annoying critics who get on the "same page as the director" and understand the inside brilliance of the directors mind.

    It is terrible and you will be left frustrated by the end, or lack of end, that is suddenly thrust on you. I love good thrillers and when I saw the cast I wondered why I hadn't watched it.

    I have never reviewed before, but after watching this I felt compelled that no, sane person should watch this unknowingly.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    4 out of 7 people found the following review useful:

    90 minutes of my life I will never get back

    1/10
    Author: acqmerger from United States
    5 October 2013

    *** This review may contain spoilers ***

    Writing at its worst. Gratuitous white trash violence. Hard to understand why Matthew M would take this one. I will be much more cautious in the future about movies in the 6-7 range on this site! Don't watch this movie based on a review of the trailer, it features only the most interesting scenes and does not characterize the movie accurately. The characters don't seem real, and their personalities are completely inconsistent throughout the film....one minute they seem to be caring and the Next minute they want to kill their mother or punch women in the nose. I may never eat fried chicken again after watching this. Don't waste 90 minutes of your life on this.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    5 out of 9 people found the following review useful:

    Vile and disgusting, only for the sick and depraved

    1/10
    Author: abitrowdy from Virginia, USA
    24 September 2013

    *** This review may contain spoilers ***

    A completely repulsing film. It is NOT a comedy, black or otherwise. It is no more than a gratuitous look at truly depraved people with absolutely no redeeming qualities at all. How bad was it? Even with full female nudity, I am sorry I watched this. To be fair, all the actors performed their roles very well. Technically, the movie is well made. But for what purpose?! NOTHING! There is nothing worthwhile about this film. Why would accomplished actors like Matthew McConaughey and Thomas Haden Church even want to make a film like this? To see it rated so highly is to make me despair for the future of our society. IMDb suggested "Lady Killers" as similar to this. Absolutely NOT! "Lady Killers" is actually a funny, well-done black comedy. "Killer Joe" is worse than a waste of time. It will take something from your soul and self-respect, leaving you worse off for having watched it.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    9 out of 17 people found the following review useful:

    Not Worth Watching

    1/10
    Author: Troy Sullivan from United States
    28 December 2012

    Matthew McConaughey is a very good actor, he was excellent with the role but the content was not his caliber.

    This is the worst movie that Matthew McConaughey has acted in, and I am surprised that he stooped so low do be part of such a low budget film.

    The movie was cheap and was not what I thought it would be.

    I kept waiting for it to get better but that failed to happen.

    Save your time and watch another movie that has a better story.

    If you want junk to entertain yourself with, this is it!

    I really don't understand how so many people would rate it above a 3.

    Cheesy and low budget.






    ©-DR-Films Mewdiks -2

    14/10/2014 09:35

    ©-DR-Films Mewdiks -2


    Hénaurme déception vu l'auteur,le casting et le réalisateur !...

    *

    *

    Uhhh...what?

    1/10
    Author: spendthedaytogether from United States
    24 November 2013

     

    I actually hadn't heard of The Counselor before a friend invited me to see it, so I just quickly checked the one sentence synopsis at the top of the page on IMDb. Basically, I had no expectations or knowledge about what the movie was about or who was in it.

    I honestly have very little understanding of what happened in this movie. It is one of the most confusing, disjointed films I have ever watched. From reading about it, you can see that it has a good cast and pretty original storyline, so what could go wrong? Believe me, what you actually see on the screen seems to defy logic.

    The first 10 or 15 minutes make the most sense, relatively speaking, but it's all downhill from there. The movie jumps from scene to scene with little explanation or context as to what is happening or why. I kept patiently waiting for everything I was seeing to be tied together, but it never happens. You keep seeing the same actors in a new scene, but there's nothing telling you what it has to do with the scene you just watched before it.

    I understand films do not necessarily need to follow a linear plot; plenty of other films have proved this to be true. However, if not following a linear plot, there should at least be SOMETHING that tells you how each scene is related, or at the very least a culmination at the end which explains all the previously unanswered questions. It just never happens. I left the theater more confused than ever, and the friend I was with felt the same way. I don't think we even cared that much about what happened anymore and were frankly just glad we didn't have to watch any more.

    I don't know how anyone could really enjoy this movie unless they were looking for something with no action, no plot and dialog performed by actors who seem more bored than I was just watching the film. I wouldn't go so far as to say it was the worst or even one of the worst movies I've ever seen, because it very easily could have made for a decent watch, I just have absolutely no idea what the director was trying to do.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    59 out of 90 people found the following review useful:

    The Counselor: I Advise You to Stay Away

    1/10
    Author: Brick Movie Reviews from United States
    28 October 2013

    *** This review may contain spoilers ***

    Down in Mexico, drugs flow like water. When a successful lawyer decides to go into business with criminals to get a piece of the action, the blood starts flowing too. The Counselor focuses on the Counselor (Michael Fassbender) and his business dealings after he becomes engaged to Laura (Penelope Cruz). With things going smoothly in his life, the Counselor tries to make some money on the side by getting himself mixed in with drug trafficking and opening a club with his friend, Reiner (Javier Bardem). Being a successful businessman and criminal, Reiner is mixed up in a confusing sexual relationship with Malkina (Cameron Diaz) who ultimately has ulterior motives from standing by Reiner's side. With the club being funded by Westray (Brad Pitt), things for the Counselor could not be better, that is until one of his clients, Ruth (Rosie Perez), calls the Counselor from jail, and asks him to get her son released from jail over a speeding ticket.

    Thinking nothing of it, the Counselor gets Ruth's son out of jail. Once released, the son meets a man at a coffee house, picks up a device that belongs on the truck that is trafficking drugs, and leaves the meeting. All the while, an assassin had been spying on the meeting, and set a trap for Ruth's son, who speeds down the roads at over 200 MPH. After the son is dead, the assassin collects the device, and leaves the body in the road. The people Ruth's son were working for suspect the Counselor was behind the killing, since he freed the son from jail. Fearing for their lives, the Counselor, Reiner, and Westray scramble to save themselves.

    Plain and simple, The Counselor, directed by Ridley Scott, is awful. The movie does not make any sense. The opening scene is an awkward lovemaking scene between Fassbender's Counselor and Cruz's Laura, and then proceeds to have sex as an underlying theme in the movie, which was, in my opinion, completely unnecessary. The movie is confusing enough without adding aspects that do not even remotely make sense in context. Throughout the entire 117 minutes, The Counselor jumps from scene to scene, plot point to plot point, without any sort of transition or explanation. To be honest, I had absolutely no idea what the movie was even about until I looked it up when I got back from the theater. Drugs were only seen twice, at the beginning and the end of the movie, and only mentioned once, which was strange given the fact that the movie was about drug trafficking. The acting was OK. None of the actors stood out and gave memorable performances. The storytelling was sloppy and haphazardly thrown together, and the writing was terrible. Quite frankly, my favorite part of the movie was the end credits.

    Of the duds of October movie releases (Runner Runner, The Fifth Estate), The Counselor is by far the WORST of them all. Granted, I gave Runner Runner and OK review and The Fifth Estate an mediocre review at best, I would recommend those movies a thousand times before I would recommend The Counselor once. The movie was sloppily made, confusing, poorly written, uninteresting, and boring. If I could give it a lower number of stars I would but I cannot, so I stick with one star, and I beg you, please save your money.

    Rating: 1 of 10

    BrickMovieReviews.wordpress.com @BrickFilmReview

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    35 out of 48 people found the following review useful:

    Wasted Talent

    1/10
    Author: ypomoni13
    24 November 2013

    *** This review may contain spoilers ***

    There was nothing for me to like about this movie. The story evolves around a Counsellor and the people surrounding him. For reasons unbeknown to us he decides to go into the drug business, and pseudo-intellectual existential dialogues between the protagonists ensue, with the main focus being on greed and how sexual everything appears to them. Cheetahs chasing jackrabbits is sexual, a yellow Ferrari is so sexual that Diaz' character decides to make-out with it (yes, you read that correctly). The Counsellor is constantly being counselled on life and it's meaning by philosophical drug-dealers and cartel members. The tediousness of these overdrawn, often repetitive and rather self-indulged exchanges make the film feel so ill paced. The chemistry between the two main couples (Fassbender-Cruz, Bardem-Diaz) was non-existent. The characters are hardly developed. Were we suppose to empathise with the Counsellor? The acting was NOT good. The ultimate attraction to this film, for me, was the cast who in it's majority has seldom - if ever - let me down. And yet, here, even they were, to put it mildly, not on top form. The emphasis had been given on the aforementioned dialogue, something that was more obvious when the main plot of the film became increasingly convoluted and thus hard to follow. At the end all I felt was content that it was over. This is, unfortunately, the worst film I've seen this year.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    93 out of 165 people found the following review useful:

    Awful

    1/10
    Author: p-j-bailey-849-678777 from Newark
    20 November 2013

    Mainly sub standard acting, hum drum story line. All scenes are way too long and just do not work.(esp scene 4/5 way though phone call from car to drug cartel, fall asleep time it lasts that long) Attended showing in Newark on Wed 20/11/13 @17:45. Of the 19 people in 4 left within the first hour, most others took the proverbial it is that poor, honestly, its awful. Still confused as to why the wild cats were in it, the story never even attempted an ending for them, opening scene woman orgasms after 30 secs oral sex (never), masturbation scene on car windscreen is laughable, implausible and utter rubbish, Probably targeting bored teens. Save your money. 0 out of 10 more fun watching grass grow

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    33 out of 50 people found the following review useful:

    Disappointing neo-noir from Ridley Scott and Cormac McCarthy

    1/10
    Author: george.schmidt (gpschmidt67@gmail.com) from fairview, nj
    14 November 2013

    *** This review may contain spoilers ***

    THE COUNSELOR (2013) * Michael Fassbender, Penelope Cruz, Cameron Diaz, Javier Bardem, Brad Pitt, Bruno Ganz, Rosie Perez, Ruben Blades, Goran Visnjic, Dean Norris, (uncredited: John Leguizamo) Disappointing neo-noir from Ridley Scott and Cormac McCarthy (his first - and should be his last - original screenplay) which makes not-a-lick-of-sense about titular Fassbender (surprisingly wooden) who finds himself in over his head in a drug deal gone awry involving mysterious cowboy middleman PItt (far-too-sedate here), an obnoxious nightclub owner (Bardem relying on wild-hair and rock star accouterments instead of 'acting), and a drug cartel out for bloody vengeance. The cardinal sin of this potboiler is the first leaden hour cannot compensate for its too-quick-to-kill final one and wasting Cruz completely. While Diaz is the film's saving grace as a femme fatale with a feline complex nothing else is worthy or remarkable except how much of a dud this truly is.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    19 out of 26 people found the following review useful:

    As pretentious as the characters

    1/10
    Author: vinylsonfilm from Amsterdam
    24 November 2013

    I've been lurking on IMDb for years, always curious to see what the interwebs thinks of certain movies or films. And most of the times I can abide with the ratings. Not in this case however. Seeing that this movie is closer to the 6 than to a 4 I just had to register and rate this awful piece of pretentiousness.

    When a movie gives you the feeling that your intelligence is failing you - several times I wondered if this is what it feels to watch Pokemon at the age of 75 - , something must have gone horribly wrong. Judging by the cast, the director, the writer, the shots, the locations and the props it's fairly safe to say that it wasn't a matter of budget.

    The story itself has potential to be interesting, it is not super-original, but originality doesn't have to be the most important aspect of a good film. The way the story unfolds, or the characters develop can suck you in. But the pace of the movie (and I can enjoy slow movies very much so) is awful, the scenes are non-sensical and the dialogues are pompous. The highlight of the movie: Javier Bardem and the scene with the car had me laughing out loud, but Im pretty sure that wasn't the effect the makers had in mind.

    Save your money and fight this piece of horrendous 'art'.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    30 out of 49 people found the following review useful:

    Awful, don't waste your time or money.

    1/10
    Author: ssandeelee
    28 November 2013

    We almost left after 30 minutes, it just didn't seem to be going anywhere but I kept thinking with the big name actors, it had to get better.....it didn't.

    Should have cut my losses before the halfway mark, even though the movie finally came together, it wasn't worth staying for.

    I did get one laugh though, abet a crude joke, but still funny, will never look at fish the same way again!

    Brad Pitt was believable in his part but Cameron Diaz was not. Choose some thing else or save your time and money and stay home.

    oh, and I no longer want to go to Mexico, and yes I know it was just a movie......

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    19 out of 28 people found the following review useful:

    Stop it Cormac! Ridley and Cameron how could you?

    1/10
    Author: phd_travel from United States
    3 December 2013

    *** This review may contain spoilers ***

    I always thought Cormac McCarthy's stories a bit overrated. Gross gruesome and ugly. But this movie really takes the cake. It's bad beyond belief. What is amazing is how they managed to get top notch actors and director to do this movie. Unlike No Country this tale tries to contrast some glamorous with the ugly but the whole story is so pointless is just isn't worth the effort.

    The sexual scenes are so bad they aren't even funny from the opening scene with Penelope and it's banal dialog to Cameron and the car. She is above such a degrading scene. She is A list. Brad Pitt all uglied up is above this too. As for Michael Fassbender I know actors more often than not have to take roles they can get but this one wasn't worth it. At least he didn't have to hump a car. The violent deaths and decapitation by that stupid device are just violence for the sake of violence and serve no purpose.

    The screenplay is so badly written that the plot isn't clear in a totally unnecessary way. There are so many stupid things like why didn't Penelope's character get out of town straight away? What about Javier's character he knew he was in trouble too. The speeches by the characters are okay but hardly compensate for the story. The only good point is the ending is realistic didn't have any cute rescues but it was just so depressing.

    Don't waste your time.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    19 out of 28 people found the following review useful:

    A wasted opportunity to do something more meaningful!!!!

    1/10
    Author: johnbren84 from Liverpool
    18 November 2013

    I just want to say that Film Muscle's review is absolutely SPOT ON, I was embarrassed watching this film it made me feel dirty and also quite uncomfortable. I appreciate what Ridley Scott has done for the film industry but he got this so wrong in so many ways, I don't normally write reviews so Im not going too, I just wanted to physically type down that I disliked this film immensely. What a disappointment, money wasted time wasted but the good thing for me was walking out of the cinema thinking Im going home to have a cup of tea and forget all about that nonsense. Should of listened to my girlfriend and watched Gravity instead.

    Was the above review useful to you?  

     

    18 out of 27 people found the following review useful:

    Best Cast and Director of 2013, worst film of 2013

    1/10
    Author: aacbuk from United Kingdom
    29 November 2013

    The IMDb plot gives a reasonable explanation of this film, however the film doesn't do the description justice.

    With such a great cast, and a great director the film has the opportunity to be a sexy, action packed, and entertaining film.

    The sexiness is over-done, to an extent where all cast members end up as caricatures of themselves. The action is lacking everywhere, unless you want to see someone shoot an UZI 9mm for a few seconds, and even thats done badly. There are no fights, no chase scenes in either car or on foot. The dialogue is lengthy but unnecessary. At least Tarantino films are witty and engaging. You can see where they have shoe-horned dialogue in so you understand the deaths of 2 character later on in the film.

    Sexy, no Action packed, no entertaining, no

    £16 and 2hrs of my life, wasted.






    Début | Page précédente | 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 | Page suivante | Fin
    [ Annuaire | VIP-Site | Charte | Admin | Contact tellurikwaves ]

    © VIP Blog - Signaler un abus