| Accueil | Créer un blog | Accès membres | Tous les blogs | Meetic 3 jours gratuit | Meetic Affinity 3 jours gratuit | Rainbow's Lips | Badoo |
newsletter de vip-blog.com S'inscrireSe désinscrire
http://tellurikwaves.vip-blog.com


 CINEMA :Les blessures narcissiques d'une vie par procuration
VIP Board
Blog express
Messages audio
Video Blog
Flux RSS

CINEMA :Les blessures narcissiques d'une vie par procuration

VIP-Blog de tellurikwaves
  • 12842 articles publiés
  • 103 commentaires postés
  • 1 visiteur aujourd'hui
  • Créé le : 10/09/2011 19:04
    Modifié : 09/08/2023 17:55

    Garçon (73 ans)
    Origine : 75 Paris
    Contact
    Favori
    Faire connaître ce blog
    Newsletter de ce blog

     Novembre  2025 
    Lun Mar Mer Jeu Ven Sam Dim
    272829300102
    03040506070809
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930

    © DR - LE NOM DE LA ROSE de J.J.Annaud (1986) p16

    11/02/2013 05:57

     © DR - LE NOM DE LA ROSE de J.J.Annaud (1986)  p16


    F. Murray Abraham (AMADEUS etc...)
    Bernardo Gui :L'inquisiteur fanatique

     

     Flawless book, almost flawless film

    Author: mightymariner from Manchester
    18 August 2003

    I've been enjoying films for 20 years now, and this is the first comment I've put on any film website. I've always had the mickey taken out of me for loving  this film, and it's right up there amongst my favourites of a very eclectic bunch. Why? Well, firstly and I have to say, very importantly, it's taken from the  finest piece of modern literature I've read. Umberto Eco's novel has such mammoth scope of subject matter and detail, it is was always going to be  extremely hard to put into film (Dune anyone??), and Annaud certainly doesn't succeed in every way, but my lord he gives it a damn good go. The film  quite rightly focusses on the human story within the book of a group of murders committed at an Italian abbey in the 14th Century, and the ongoing  search for the purpetrator, by a Franciscan monk and his apprentice. The book encompasses many other issues and plotlines, which could not be fitted into the film. The three screenwriters do an excellent job, of filming the almost impossible to within 2 hours or so. Most importantly to me, the  cinematography and set are sublime, almost unsurpassed in modern film to my mind, and still to this day amazing.

    I've always found that many non movie-lovers remember this film, for good or bad. The main reason for me is that it recreates so impressively the period  it represents. Tonino Delli Colli, I salute you. The production team deserves a similar merit for bringing together what was in essence an European  co-production, whilst not forgetting the biggest exterior set built in Europe since "Cleopatra". Step forward Dante Ferreti. I salute you too. 0.1 of a mark  off for the editing, but let's not dwell on that. The acting is, bar none, marvellous, with even Christian Slater in his first main role putting up an extremely  decent stab of being an apprentice monk.I like a good whodunnit, but I adore a whodunnit which throws in the visual magnificence of a different age,top notch performances, a script taken from a extraordinary source, and assured directing. 10 out of 10, and my mates can carry on taking the mickey out f me.

    So in summary, I'll leave it to the director himself.. `When I see a film, I love it when I'm entertained, when I care for the actors, when I share their  emotions, when I'm scared, when I'm in love, but also if I learn a little something, if I have the feeling that I haven't seen something before, and that's  what `The Name of the Rose' has.'

     






    [ Annuaire | VIP-Site | Charte | Admin | Contact tellurikwaves ]

    © VIP Blog - Signaler un abus